PDA

View Full Version : Call of duty 5 World At War

Sh4mmy
06-28-2008, 12:39 PM
i've seen the video and to be honest , garbage is the first thing that comes to mind. a filler game till infinity ward finish making cod6
SF_KiLLaMaN
06-28-2008, 05:57 PM
im still going to buy it regardless of the trailer. i dont think a call of duty game can be garbage.....
JamesKryack
06-28-2008, 06:18 PM
I'll play a demo when it comes out, but I'm not buying the game hands-down.
Sh4mmy
06-28-2008, 07:14 PM
im still going to buy it regardless of the trailer. i dont think a call of duty game can be garbage.....

call of duty 2 was average , 3 fair to poor , infinity ward made 4 one of the best games on the 360, and to see the makers of cod3 making cod5 and going back to wwII, i have to say that i am disappointed .

infinity ward are in the process of making cod6 so theres fore i see cod5 as a filler in , maybe garbage was too strong a word , but its not too fr from the truth.
SF_KiLLaMaN
06-29-2008, 03:59 AM
call of duty 2 was average?? that is one of the best games ever created!!
MonkeyKing
06-29-2008, 07:24 AM
iam still going to buy the games anyway
Yukushii
06-29-2008, 07:25 AM
what i'm wondering is why make a sequel to the sequel? i kind of think that's a bit dumb/weird... but, oh well.
Sh4mmy
06-29-2008, 12:30 PM
what i'm wondering is why make a sequel to the sequel? i kind of think that's a bit dumb/weird... but, oh well.


my guess is money
SF_KiLLaMaN
06-30-2008, 01:40 AM
plus what more could happen after call of duty 4?? everyone in your squad but you dies and the nuclear threat is stopped, russia is back to a democracy and the enemy are done because no leadership.
Midreian
06-30-2008, 07:59 PM
I was not impressed at all by what I saw. I hate the World War 1 and World War 2 era games after having some many flood the video game market. I was kind of hoping they would have done a futuristic COD, but no.. go back to some lame period that they already have three games based on.
SF_KiLLaMaN
07-01-2008, 06:49 AM
yea but they are also going to focus oh the pacific war aka the US vs japan which will be pretty awesome.
Juice
07-01-2008, 07:44 AM
Shammy im going to have to agree with you on this one, world at war would be ALOT better is it were perhaps taking place in the near future.
Useless Dave
07-02-2008, 05:16 AM
I want a future COD it went from modern warfare to the stone age. Modern warfare was perfect in all aspects of gameplay. The multiplayer was FAR superior than any other call of duty games.

I want a Beam of death tank.
pureicecold
07-02-2008, 01:03 PM
OK, i don't get it why would they make a modern. That has beat halo 3...
then go back to old..
I mean common
SF_KiLLaMaN
07-02-2008, 10:49 PM
why would they not go back to World War 2?? is this any suprise? EVRYONE is making modern war games now, this will be a break from the modern games. plus they saw a perfect chance to cash in on something they didn't cover, the pacific war.
sn0wm4n951
07-05-2008, 05:08 AM
Going back to WWII is a bad move imo.
Sh4mmy
07-05-2008, 02:46 PM
roll on cod 6 which is being made by infinity ward and will hopefully not be a ww2 game, also why bring vehicles in to a known infantry game, clans rarely play with vehicles .there will be vehicles in cod5 .

basically cod5 is just a filler.on the success of cod4 they reckon they'll make a packet out of us buying cod5, and you know what , of course they will.