[Sold] halo

[~flow+]

v1:
http://www.signaturebar.com/uploads/images/35869.png (http://www.signaturebar.com/)

v2:
http://www.signaturebar.com/uploads/images/35870.png (http://www.signaturebar.com/)


Price: 100Sigbar points

say which version you want and what text...

[firetiger]

hmm great sig

I might buy..

[firetiger]

v1:
http://www.signaturebar.com/uploads/images/35869.png (http://www.signaturebar.com/)

v2:
http://www.signaturebar.com/uploads/images/35870.png (http://www.signaturebar.com/)


Price: 100Sigbar points

say which version you want and what text...


Please note Blackwolf you havent put the Do not rip water mark on.

Do so quickly to prevent rippers

[Zehro]

Not necessary. Your name is good enough. If you try to smudge it out, it ruins the flow and almost every other art website will be able to tell that the text got smudged out by some ripper.

[Hone]

Hey Zehro, ill make you a 100 sbp bet i could rip that sig and make it look like i didnt. (Ill delete the files afterwards blackwolf)

[firetiger]

Hey Zehro, ill make you a 100 sbp bet i could rip that sig and make it look like i didnt. (Ill delete the files afterwards blackwolf)

Hone do not abuse people mistakes

[Hone]

What the hell are you talking about? Im trying to prove that youll most likely need a great watermark if you dont want your sig stolen.

[Zehro]

The problem with that is that the "Your name" resembles the name being put there. The final version will not have water marks. Making it rip able by you. If you can rip the one with "Your name" then how is it any different from ripping one with someones name in its place?
BTW Hone you may wish you read the rules sometime.

[Kumani]

guys you know an admin is bound to come. Hone, stop making bets about trying to change names and whatnot. Do not mess with others art work. Respect it.

"your name" is good enough. Zehro is right.

Also, PM each other next time because it's not fair to the sig maker to have their thread totally spammed.

[firetiger]

The problem with that is that the "Your name" resembles the name being put there. The final version will not have water marks. Making it rip able by you. If you can rip the one with "Your name" then how is it any different from ripping one with someones name in its place?
BTW Hone you may wish you read the rules sometime.


http://signaturebar.com/forums/viewtopic.php?t=11612

Is the staff members oppinion on ripping

[+dd. jeffsigs]

Wow this Post got alittle out of hand. It is up to the seller to put a watermark on it or not to. It would potentially benefit the seller and the Buyer to have one so it does not get ripped. I personally saw nothing wrong with Hones comment which was basically telling Zehro that it can still be ripped with just a name on it. He did not Do it he just said he could do it.

But my problem is that there are 8 posts that were not needed. The 4 sale section works great becuase if you want to buy a sig people can come and see that there is 0 post and 21 looks which would show the person that there is no buyer, or comment commitment toward the selling sig. Just makes it easier. I dont want alot of chatter in this section to keep it clean.

And on top of that this is in the RULES
- For your protection and the buyers please add a watermark to the unfinished (FOR SALE or DONT RIP etc. etc) with a low opacity to discourage rippers and then when you finish it for the buyer please delete that layer.
Example of Watermark (FOR SALE). Please take off after you put the buyers name on the sig.

[ChaosSlumber]

hmm funny thread, awyway. ill buy V1. the name is "DaveGordon" sigpoints have been sent to you.

[~flow+]

srry for wait i was on christiany camp last 8 days so i wasnt able to be in computer but now im back and i do it soon

[Hone]

Seeing as its been bought, i'd like to say, i wasn't breaking the rules, i was trying to prove my point that a watermark makes perfect sense. Your name is here is very easy to disguise or remove if you know what your doing. But most rippers don't, so whatever.

[~flow+]

ready!!!

...

srry for wait...
reason is in earlier post...

v1:
http://www.signaturebar.com/uploads/images/36960.png (http://www.signaturebar.com/)
http://www.signaturebar.com/uploads/images/36960.png (http://www.signaturebar.com/)

v2:
http://www.signaturebar.com/uploads/images/36958.png (http://www.signaturebar.com/)
http://www.signaturebar.com/uploads/images/36958.png (http://www.signaturebar.com/)

;)